AAP’s Aghadi in Delhi, but BJP’s strong fight; Congress doesn’t even bother A to Z Counsel

New Delhi: For the last few days, the target of the entire country was being followed, the results of the Delhi Municipal Corporation elections are being declared today. Matmojanila started at eight o’clock in the morning. Since then, Arvind Kejriwal’s Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has clearly taken a lead in the past. Presently Aam Aadmi Party is leading 128 Jaganwar Aghadivar. And there are 106 Jaganwar Aghadiwar candidates from BJP. Total 39 Jaganche have been removed. Of these, 17 Jaganwar AAP, 20 Jaganwar BJP candidates have won. And both Jaganwar Congress candidates have won. Apart from this, there are 11 Jaganwar Aghadiwar candidates from the Congress party. Elections would have been held for a total of 250 seats in the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. 175 is necessary for the majority. Looking at the present situation, the figure of the majority of the Aam Aadmi Party is falling, this is the picture.

Looking at the results of the Delhi Municipal Corporation elections, the percentage of votes of Aam Aadmi Party has increased as compared to last time. AAP got almost 43 percent votes in the Yanda elections. Figures are subject to change until full results are published. And BJP has so far got 39 percent votes. The percentage of votes of the Congress party seems to have decreased only. In the last election, the percentage of votes polled by the Congress decreased by 9 percent and so far they have got 12.5 percent votes.

Earlier most of the exit polls in Delhi Municipal Corporation would have given a majority to the Aam Aadmi Party. This guess almost seems to be true. But, Kejriwal’s Aam Aadmi Paksha BJP will give 100 Jagancha Tappa Olandoon, it will be important to see. According to India Today-Axis My India exit poll, Aam Aadmi Pakshala can get 149 to 171 seats. And BJP’s floor can go from 69 to 91 days. Congress is expected to get only 3 to 7 seats. And there is a possibility of getting other 5 to 9 seats, such an estimate would have been applicable.